
Barber Dime Dates & Mintmarks
All 75 issues of the series, 1892 through 1916. Charles Barber's design ran on the dime, quarter and half dollar at once, so this catalog has two companions on the site. The 1894-S is the coin this series is known for: San Francisco struck twenty-four dimes and nobody has established why.
No prices, price guides, or population counts appear anywhere in this catalog. Coin Curator does not hold licensed data for any of those, so it publishes none. How we work.
75
Date/mint combinations
10
Key dates
under 750k struck
20
Semi-keys
under 2.5M struck
4
Mints
P, D, O, S
| Date | Mint | Mintage | Rank | Tier | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1892-O | New Orleans | 3,841,700 | 41 | Common date | — |
| 1892-P | Philadelphia | 12,120,000 | 60 | Common date | 1,245 proofs |
| 1892-S | San Francisco | 990,710 | 14 | Semi-key | — |
| 1893-O | New Orleans | 1,760,000 | 21 | Semi-key | — |
| 1893-P | Philadelphia | 3,340,000 | 36 | Common date | 792 proofs |
| 1893-S | San Francisco | 2,491,401 | 30 | Semi-key | — |
| 1894-O | New Orleans | 720,000 | 10 | Key date | — |
| 1894-P | Philadelphia | 1,330,000 | 18 | Semi-key | 972 proofs |
| 1894-S | San Francisco | 24 | 1 | Key date | see note |
| 1895-O | New Orleans | 440,000 | 2 | Key date | — |
| 1895-P | Philadelphia | 690,000 | 9 | Key date | 880 proofs |
| 1895-S | San Francisco | 1,120,000 | 16 | Semi-key | — |
| 1896-O | New Orleans | 610,000 | 6 | Key date | — |
| 1896-P | Philadelphia | 2,000,000 | 24 | Semi-key | 762 proofs |
| 1896-S | San Francisco | 575,056 | 4 | Key date | — |
| 1897-O | New Orleans | 666,000 | 8 | Key date | — |
| 1897-P | Philadelphia | 10,868,533 | 55 | Common date | 731 proofs |
| 1897-S | San Francisco | 1,342,844 | 19 | Semi-key | — |
| 1898-O | New Orleans | 2,130,000 | 28 | Semi-key | — |
| 1898-P | Philadelphia | 16,320,000 | 63 | Common date | 735 proofs |
| 1898-S | San Francisco | 1,702,507 | 20 | Semi-key | — |
| 1899-O | New Orleans | 2,650,000 | 32 | Common date | — |
| 1899-P | Philadelphia | 19,850,000 | 72 | Common date | 846 proofs |
| 1899-S | San Francisco | 1,867,493 | 23 | Semi-key | — |
| 1900-O | New Orleans | 2,010,000 | 25 | Semi-key | — |
| 1900-P | Philadelphia | 17,600,000 | 65 | Common date | 912 proofs |
| 1900-S | San Francisco | 5,168,270 | 46 | Common date | — |
| 1901-O | New Orleans | 5,620,000 | 47 | Common date | — |
| 1901-P | Philadelphia | 18,859,665 | 67 | Common date | 813 proofs |
| 1901-S | San Francisco | 593,022 | 5 | Key date | — |
| 1902-O | New Orleans | 4,500,000 | 44 | Common date | — |
| 1902-P | Philadelphia | 21,380,000 | 74 | Common date | 777 proofs |
| 1902-S | San Francisco | 2,070,000 | 26 | Semi-key | — |
| 1903-O | New Orleans | 8,180,000 | 52 | Common date | — |
| 1903-P | Philadelphia | 19,500,000 | 70 | Common date | 755 proofs |
| 1903-S | San Francisco | 613,300 | 7 | Key date | — |
| 1904-P | Philadelphia | 14,600,357 | 62 | Common date | 670 proofs |
| 1904-S | San Francisco | 800,000 | 11 | Semi-key | — |
| 1905-O | New Orleans | 3,400,000 | 37 | Common date | — |
| 1905-P | Philadelphia | 14,551,623 | 61 | Common date | 727 proofs |
| 1905-S | San Francisco | 6,855,199 | 50 | Common date | — |
| 1906-D | Denver | 4,060,000 | 42 | Common date | — |
| 1906-O | New Orleans | 2,610,000 | 31 | Common date | — |
| 1906-P | Philadelphia | 19,957,731 | 73 | Common date | 675 proofs |
| 1906-S | San Francisco | 3,136,640 | 33 | Common date | — |
| 1907-D | Denver | 4,080,000 | 43 | Common date | — |
| 1907-O | New Orleans | 5,058,000 | 45 | Common date | — |
| 1907-P | Philadelphia | 22,220,000 | 75 | Common date | 575 proofs |
| 1907-S | San Francisco | 3,178,470 | 34 | Common date | — |
| 1908-D | Denver | 7,490,000 | 51 | Common date | — |
| 1908-O | New Orleans | 1,789,000 | 22 | Semi-key | — |
| 1908-P | Philadelphia | 10,600,000 | 54 | Common date | 545 proofs |
| 1908-S | San Francisco | 3,220,000 | 35 | Common date | — |
| 1909-D | Denver | 954,000 | 12 | Semi-key | — |
| 1909-O | New Orleans | 2,287,000 | 29 | Semi-key | — |
| 1909-P | Philadelphia | 10,240,000 | 53 | Common date | 650 proofs |
| 1909-S | San Francisco | 1,000,000 | 15 | Semi-key | — |
| 1910-D | Denver | 3,490,000 | 39 | Common date | — |
| 1910-P | Philadelphia | 11,520,000 | 57 | Common date | 551 proofs |
| 1910-S | San Francisco | 1,240,000 | 17 | Semi-key | — |
| 1911-D | Denver | 11,209,000 | 56 | Common date | — |
| 1911-P | Philadelphia | 18,870,000 | 68 | Common date | 543 proofs |
| 1911-S | San Francisco | 3,520,000 | 40 | Common date | — |
| 1912-D | Denver | 11,760,000 | 58 | Common date | — |
| 1912-P | Philadelphia | 19,349,300 | 69 | Common date | 700 proofs |
| 1912-S | San Francisco | 3,420,000 | 38 | Common date | — |
| 1913-P | Philadelphia | 19,760,000 | 71 | Common date | 622 proofs |
| 1913-S | San Francisco | 510,000 | 3 | Key date | — |
| 1914-D | Denver | 11,908,000 | 59 | Common date | — |
| 1914-P | Philadelphia | 17,360,230 | 64 | Common date | 425 proofs |
| 1914-S | San Francisco | 2,100,000 | 27 | Semi-key | — |
| 1915-P | Philadelphia | 5,620,000 | 48 | Common date | 450 proofs |
| 1915-S | San Francisco | 960,000 | 13 | Semi-key | — |
| 1916-P | Philadelphia | 18,490,000 | 66 | Common date | — |
| 1916-S | San Francisco | 5,820,000 | 49 | Common date | — |
Rank 1 is the lowest business-strike mintage in the series. Tiers are assigned from reported mintage alone: under 750,000 struck is a key date, under 2,500,000 a semi-key. The same thresholds apply to every series on this site, so tiers are comparable between them. That is a production measure, not a market judgement, and not a statement about how many survive.
Shopping the series
Individual date pages open a search for that exact date and mint. This one covers the series. Verify every listing, seller, and return policy directly.
Affiliate link: Coin Curator may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosure.
Common questions
How many Barber dime dates and mintmarks are there?
75, struck at Philadelphia, Denver, New Orleans and San Francisco. New Orleans stopped striking coins in 1909 and Denver only opened in 1906, so no single mint covers the whole run.
Who was Charles Barber, and why is one design on three denominations?
Barber was the Mint's chief engraver. The Mint had run a public competition to replace the Seated Liberty design and found the entries unsatisfactory, a judgement Barber himself helped reach, and his own design was adopted instead. It was then applied to the dime, quarter and half dollar together, which is why the three series share a span and a look.
Where do these mintage figures come from?
They are U.S. Mint production records, cross-checked on 2026-08-02 against three published tables. Two of the three report proofs separately and agree on every issue; the third adds that year's proofs into its Philadelphia figures on all twenty-four proof years. This catalog reports business strikes and shows proofs in their own field.
Does Coin Curator publish Barber dime values?
No. This catalog carries U.S. Mint production figures, historical context, and documented varieties. It does not publish prices, valuations, price guides, or population and census counts, because Coin Curator does not hold licensed data for any of those. Pages link to the grading services' own certification lookups and to marketplace searches so you can check current evidence yourself.
Mintage sources
Mintage figures are U.S. Mint production records, cross-checked against the published tables below on 2026-08-02. Where those tables disagree, the disagreement is disclosed on the affected page rather than resolved silently.
- CoinMintages.com, Barber Dime mintages — Business strikes and proofs listed separately. Used as the business-strike figures here.
- LandOfCoins, Barber Dime mintage — Independent table with proofs in their own column. Agrees with the above on every issue.
- USA Coin Book, Barber Dime — Third table, whose Philadelphia figures add that year's proofs into the total. Used to confirm the convention rather than as a primary source.
Spotted an error? Submit a correction.